3 ms·
Since cmd+<number> now switches tab in Terminal.app, and the other few things I like, such as remembering the scrollbacks, number of tabs and cwd's, I find I ha
by Flow 7y ago
Since cmd+<number> now switches tab in Terminal.app, and the other few things I like, such as remembering the scrollbacks, number of tabs and cwd's, I find I have no use of iTerm2 any longer.
Plus, Terminal.app feels much faster. Using terminal Emacs feels very different in the two terminals.
- reaperducer 7y agoPlus, Terminal.app feels much faster. Using terminal Emacs feels very different in the two terminals. I recently switched back to Terminal from iTerm, and was amazed by the speed increase. When entering commands, it is visibly a little "snappier." But where it really shines is in the output. I have a few of batch processes that I have to run once a week, and they're all pretty heavy on the debug output, with lots of VT100 eye candy. One process that used to take close to six hours in iTerm got significantly shaved when I switched to Terminal. Since I only run this once a week, I haven't had a chance to benchmark it, but my guess is that Terminal shaved 40 minutes off the job. The only thing I miss from iTerm is having two sessions open in a single window. I suspect this is possible in Terminal, but I haven't figured it out yet. When I click the "Split Pane" button, I get two panes of the same session, instead of a new session in the new pane.