3 ms·
If the government succeeds in getting advanced ML/AI type software classified as arms (that idea comes up from time to time in the context of reducing industria
by dsfyu404ed 7y ago
If the government succeeds in getting advanced ML/AI type software classified as arms (that idea comes up from time to time in the context of reducing industrial espionage) then in the US that would naturally lend itself to the argument that private ownership and operation of these sorts of surveillance systems are protected under the 2A.
The arguments traditionally used to prevent private ownership of the kind of arms that let you go toe to toe with a modern military don't really work very well for software.
- aidenn0 7y agoSure. Just like main battle tanks and nuclear warheads...
- Ragnarork 7y agoI'll never understand how people come to believe that civilian amateurs with AR-15 have somewhat of a chance against trained professionals with heavy equipment. The mental gym to justify the 2A is really mindboggling.
- C1sc0cat 7y agoClassified as a destructive device :-) Maybe I should register forgotten-algorithms.com only my ponytail isn't as long as Ian's