Yeah, that's true. I think the point of the source is that the first line of defense is with the originator of the code. Sure, the context switch is expensiv

Yeah, that's true. I think the point of the source is that the first line of defense is with the originator of the code. Sure, the context switch is expensive, but that's the price of higher quality. It's not really about firing the QA team. Instead, it's about having a QA function that does not entirely relieve the original author of his duty to ensure quality.