3 ms·

Of course the typical non-information made up by a PR department and cleared by legal... So they are saying a contracted Email provider was compromised. It sho

Of course the typical non-information made up by a PR department and cleared by legal... So they are saying a contracted Email provider was compromised. It should not be a big secret what provider T-Mobile uses in the US. Microsoft? Gmail? ...?

quaa55 7y ago
> dig mx t-mobile.com ; <<>> DiG 9.9.7-P3 <<>> mx t-mobile.com ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 39537 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1 ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION: ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 512 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;t-mobile.com. IN MX ;; ANSWER SECTION: t-mobile.com. 31 IN MX 10 tmobile-com0c.mail.prote ction.outlook.com. Office 365 mail?
quaa55 7y ago
blink> dig mx t-mobile.com ;; ANSWER SECTION: t-mobile.com. 31 IN MX 10 tmobile-com0c.mail.protection.outlook.com. office 365?
dvtrn 7y ago
Earlier today this happened: One of my employers strategic partners is a national telecom and cellular provider. You probably have their service. Just happens to not be t-mobile in this case. Anyway we were working on a project regarding turning down some MPLS circuits at a data center we are exiting and one of the engineers from this telecom asked us to submit further updates and status changes to a personal yahoo email address of his. I’m still waiting on a response from our account manager if this is standard and expressing concern. The director of my business unit was apoplectic when I showed him. This will be an interesting conversation.
- usr1106 7y ago
  This happened to a US Secretary of State... But seriously, T-Mobile talks about their provider, not about a random employee using an unauthorized one. Even if their statement has little substance, I assume it is not directly untrue. But even that happened before...

quaa55 7y ago

> dig mx t-mobile.com ; <<>> DiG 9.9.7-P3 <<>> mx t-mobile.com ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 39537 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1 ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION: ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 512 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;t-mobile.com. IN MX ;; ANSWER SECTION: t-mobile.com. 31 IN MX 10 tmobile-com0c.mail.prote ction.outlook.com. Office 365 mail?

quaa55 7y ago

blink> dig mx t-mobile.com ;; ANSWER SECTION: t-mobile.com. 31 IN MX 10 tmobile-com0c.mail.protection.outlook.com. office 365?

dvtrn 7y ago

Earlier today this happened: One of my employers strategic partners is a national telecom and cellular provider. You probably have their service. Just happens to not be t-mobile in this case. Anyway we were working on a project regarding turning down some MPLS circuits at a data center we are exiting and one of the engineers from this telecom asked us to submit further updates and status changes to a personal yahoo email address of his. I’m still waiting on a response from our account manager if this is standard and expressing concern. The director of my business unit was apoplectic when I showed him. This will be an interesting conversation.

usr1106 7y ago
This happened to a US Secretary of State... But seriously, T-Mobile talks about their provider, not about a random employee using an unauthorized one. Even if their statement has little substance, I assume it is not directly untrue. But even that happened before...