> but you shouldn't rely on people being elbow-deep for noticing problems in real time. I completely and unreservedly agree. > that's a bug in automated monit

> but you shouldn't rely on people being elbow-deep for noticing problems in real time. I completely and unreservedly agree. > that's a bug in automated monitoring As part of incident review, we explicitly added a "review monitor performance" step. My favorite part is that the number of times monitors are created, adjusted or complained about post-incident is in itself a highly useful datapoint.