"Drawable" as a name is pretty bland, like patterns. Do we ever really say "drawable" out loud? So I suspect if we seek more meaningful objects and models, the

"Drawable" as a name is pretty bland, like patterns. Do we ever really say "drawable" out loud? So I suspect if we seek more meaningful objects and models, they become more active, have better names, improved design, etc. If you ask a janitor about Drawable, will he say it's all about draw()? So I think it's kind of a dreary default that we need to avoid and focus on who the actors are, what messages they will pass, and the hidden treasures they encapsulate (don't show, but tell!).