2 ms·
How is this different from Heroku review apps [1] besides that it's not Heroku? We have this at work. Every PR provisions a new app with your code deployed on
by photonios 7y ago
How is this different from Heroku review apps [1] besides that it's not Heroku?
We have this at work. Every PR provisions a new app with your code deployed on it. Since we use a mono-repo, we built a small Github bot that depending on Github labels sets up the right app.
[1] https://devcenter.heroku.com/articles/github-integration-review-apps https://devcenter.heroku.com/articles/github-integration-rev...
- tommy_mcclung 7y agoI think the main difference is support for complex applications (lots of services) and running in your own AWS account. We actually have a few customers who have been using Heroku Review Apps and their application has outgrown Heroku and they were bummed they were going to lose that functionality and were now faced with having to build that themselves. For companies that are just starting out or just have simple apps we think our Free and Professional plans are somewhat competitive (albeit it a little more work for now) with Heroku but we don't have the growing out of it issue.
- Ozzie_osman 7y agoMy team uses Heroku review apps and it's just a click to turn on (plus a config file or two if you want to copy over staging data, etc). But i can see it getting complicated if you have more complex setups.