3 ms·
Same thing about frame rates derived from NTSC, where e.g. 60 fps in not really 60 fps, but 60/1.001 fps. Those extremely inconvenient frame rates are ubiquitou
by kozak 7y ago
Same thing about frame rates derived from NTSC, where e.g. 60 fps in not really 60 fps, but 60/1.001 fps. Those extremely inconvenient frame rates are ubiquitous in systems that have nothing to do with analog broadcast television (e.g. on your YouTube).
- AnimalMuppet 7y agoPedantic nit: That's the field rate, not the frame rate. The frame rate is 30/1.001 fps. This is because NTSC is interlaced.
- kozak 7y agoNo, I really meant what I said. If you see a video that's labeled "60 fps", quite likely it's actually 60/1.001 fps. It applies to the entire 24/30/60/120 range.
- AnimalMuppet 7y agoI re-read, and your claim was "derived from NTSC", not that NTSC itself was 60/1.001 fps. So, yeah. NTSC itself was (30 frames or 60 fields) / 1.001. "Derived from NTSC"... yeah, that could be "60 frames".
- AnIdiotOnTheNet 7y agoHowever it is perfectly possible to skip the half scanline between fields and produce a non-interlaced display with half the vertical resolution and twice the frame rate.