> And that's the same decision making process the RCMP uses when they decide to use tools like these. So we're all fucked. By this reasoning no bridge is too f

> And that's the same decision making process the RCMP uses when they decide to use tools like these. So we're all fucked. By this reasoning no bridge is too far. Chip every citizen like a dog? Why not, it might help save a child. Government controlled cameras in every domicile? Of course! What if it helps save a kidnapped child!? Justice is not about "doing everything possible", it's about balancing the rights of victims with the rights of the public. If I'm a distraught parent, I might want to ignore this balance. But the government should not, no matter how much I want them too.