2 ms·
It didn't say it's no big deal, you're extrapolating and exaggerating my words because your argument is weak. My point was that failure is inevitable in any co
by malux85 7y ago
It didn't say it's no big deal, you're extrapolating and exaggerating my words because your argument is weak.
My point was that failure is inevitable in any complex system, and I was responding to the parents point that he immediately pointed the finger at management in an accusatory way, and I was saying that's not constructive.
Also your point "They expect to be paid" is actually implicitly "I expect management do do their best to pay me" - there could be a failure in the payroll system, there could be a failure in the banks, there could be many reasons outside managements control that means I'm not getting paid. I can say "why don't you have redundant payroll systems" (which is a stupid waste of resources given the cost/benefit/low failure rate) But my point is again - complex systems have failures - and SOMETIMES, JUST SOMETIMES, YOU CAN CUT THEM SOME SLACK.
- 0x8BADF00D 7y agoWhen a fiduciary breaks their duty to their clients, you don’t cut them slack. You sue them. This isn’t like Silicon Valley where you can get away with antics like this.
- malux85 7y agoYou must be new here, welcome to late stage capitalism. Nobody rich goes to jail, and lawsuits are cost of business. You just factor them into the 5 billion dollar company, pay your 300M dollar fine and walk away a billionaire. It sucks, I'm not defending it, but it's fact