Your option is not reality and you're trivializing this to the common flu. Would you have done the same with SARS? Because it's similar to that disease (from w

Your option is not reality and you're trivializing this to the common flu. Would you have done the same with SARS? Because it's similar to that disease (from what we know: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1287568/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1287568/). It can destroy your airway and it may even lie dormant in your brain and come back when you get another flu. Surprise! Now you're dealing with a fever and pneumonia in your 30s. https://www.businessinsider.com/coronavirus-in-charts-covid-19-symptoms-spread-deaths-warnings-2020-2 https://www.businessinsider.com/coronavirus-in-charts-covid-... Look at the global spread map. 92,303 infected vs 48,190 recovered (and these numbers are probably WAY underreported). There are 40k people still in recovery? How many more is that going to add to the death toll? The death rate is 3.3% very much not like the flu. And if you go get sick and need medical treatment, guess what? Hospitals are going to be backed up. It's just an incredibly irresponsible response. But be my guest and start licking some doorknobs. I'll be quarantining myself.