> That’s actually often just a consequence of the subsetting (I think). I would believe that. It was a pretty poor obfuscation method as they go, if it was in

> That’s actually often just a consequence of the subsetting (I think). I would believe that. It was a pretty poor obfuscation method as they go, if it was intended for that. > Believe it or not, you can often rebuild the cmaps using information in the pdf to fix the mapping and make the extraction work again. Oh, I did. That's the flip side of my second paragraph above. When there's a business need to work around complications or obfuscations, that will also happen. :)