Sadly there's a couple paradoxes. Some occasiinal contributions only press for others to do something, helpfully pointing out what they think are mistakes and

Sadly there's a couple paradoxes. Some occasiinal contributions only press for others to do something, helpfully pointing out what they think are mistakes and errors. This is someone with an axe to grind in denigrating wiki lingo. As someone who's been told of there before, I think I understand the problem, and I like to agree with Aaron's sentiment--I don't know where it's coming from, though. The quote is very much related. Who is "we"? > we need to broaden the base of those who contribute just a little bit. Easing the entry to beaurocracy would likely increase its burden significantly, while its not strictly separable from content contribution. Nevertheless, being a frequent and fair editor is not a sufficient criterium for good administration, sadly.