2 ms·
Uh, why is this getting downvoted? It's a purely informational post. Is it not considered relevant if the Steve weighed in? Seems there's a bit of a pattern in
by Bud 16y ago
Uh, why is this getting downvoted? It's a purely informational post. Is it not considered relevant if the Steve weighed in?
Seems there's a bit of a pattern in these threads of downvoting based on disagreement with the ESP-perceived viewpoint of the poster. Not cool.
- othermaciej 16y agoI'm guessing the downvotes are because it's vanishingly unlikely that Steve Jobs posted a blog comment.
- sorbus 16y agoOne person downvoted you, or at least you were at 0 when I wrote this. If the collective thinks that your post is valuable, it will be upvoted, and will eventually balance out those who think that it is not valuable. (Disclaimer: I upvoted your original post to 1, while downvoting the post in which you complained about being downvoted to 0, as complaining about being downvoted is explicitly against the guidelines - and you could have edited your original post, instead of responding to yourself.)