> "guilty until proven innocent" I think that's still a good approach. You want Wikipedia to be a trustworthy source, not one where everyone can add their half

> "guilty until proven innocent" I think that's still a good approach. You want Wikipedia to be a trustworthy source, not one where everyone can add their half-knowledge without any checks. Maybe making the discussion pages more "interactive" might help a bit. People could share their ideas, interesting sources or other inputs in a casual way and someone more skilled in writing and researching could use that to write the proper article.