> Kinglsey is a great scholar and respected as such He is not however respected as a historian or archaeologist of Northern Eurasia, which would allow him to c

> Kinglsey is a great scholar and respected as such He is not however respected as a historian or archaeologist of Northern Eurasia, which would allow him to claim that any figure in Greek history came specifically from Mongolia. If he says in the book that this is merely his own speculation, that would be fine, but the fact is that speculation is all it would be. > I recommend refreshing your perspective by reading "esotericism in the academy" by Wouter Hanagraaf. Or, "western esotericism: a guide for the perplexed" Esoteric philosophy and its validity or lack thereof is irrelevant to the historical–archaeological claim that you made in your post above.