Does anyone else find it quite funny that the article about the Renaissance IPO Index is literally headlined: >2019 IPO Market: Better Than the Headlines and

Does anyone else find it quite funny that the article about the Renaissance IPO Index is literally headlined: >2019 IPO Market: Better Than the Headlines and literally says: > beyond these headline-grabbing disappointments, the IPO market had a mostly good year. If you're going to write a boring cherry-picked article making the case the sky is falling, here's a tip: Don't literally cite research that says "The data says the sky isn't falling even though people are writing articles about it" Shouldn't we be talking about the opposite of this article. If IPOs are not making great returns, shouldn't that indicate VCs are dying, not IPOs? Of course it doesn't matter because IPOs are fine and so are VCs.