4 ms·
In that context, yes. But in the context of (eg) a person that just happened to drop here on HN for a quick read, it makes no sense in the headline.
by pedrocx486 7y ago
In that context, yes. But in the context of (eg) a person that just happened to drop here on HN for a quick read, it makes no sense in the headline.
- jiofih 7y agoWelcome to hacker news.
- GEBBL 7y agoSomeone who scanned the front page and didn’t delve into these comments might infere that the American news network CNN artificially generate images for their news stories. That’s how I picked this up.
- Piskvorrr 7y agoWhere artificially generated images are improbable. Oh wait. Also, let me quote the linked page: > malicious use of fake imagery is likely be deployed on a social media platform Nope, that couldn't possibly relate to any news network. Never never never gonna admit that!
- Cthulhu_ 7y agoWhere would you draw the line though? Would you want the same for e.g. HTML? HTTP? HN? YC? I mean personally I'm all in favor of more usage - or even automatic insertion - of the `<abbr>` tag. Can probably be done with a browser addon as well.
- m12k 7y agoOne relatively easy to draw line is whether the abbreviation has other commonly used meanings. CNN has, while none of HTML, HTTP, HN or YC do.
- kristopolous 7y ago"CNN generated Image" sounds like "Images generated by the Cable News Network, CNN" as if the corporation has some software/policy for editing and prepping images in a way they can be detected. It's not so absurd, photojournalism can be quite specific in rules. The ability to classify photos by news outlet based on identifying their photojournalism rules through computer algorithms sounds like a remarkably clever idea. HTML doesn't have that ambiguity.
- saystupidthings 7y agoLmao imagine seeing "CNN generated images" and thinking it was the news channel.
- kerakaali 7y agoI wonder if part of an issue is the generation gap? For older readers, I imagine that they're much more familiar with CNN referring to the Cable News Network. Whereas for younger readers heavily involved in tech, me included, we aren't as heavily tied to the former abbreviation, so CNN referring to neural networks comes more readily to mind.
- pedrocx486 7y agoWell, I'm not "old" (which ever the definition is) yet. I'm just on the Front-End side of the dev world. Never fiddled with AI/Neural Networks.
- kd5bjo 7y agoIt’s all about audience and confusion. My feel of the HN readership is that it’s a vey broad base of mostly technical backgrounds; international but US heavy. That puts the ones you list as perfectly reasonable, and CNN referring to the neural networks is usually ok. I this case, however, there’s a conflict with the news network which could also plausibly be the subject of the headline. They have interenational recognizability, and have been using the acronym almost exclusively for years; it is effectively their name.
- eknkc 7y agoMaybe when it is a widely known abbreviation for something else? We are not computer algorithms here. A human being can decide "yeah this sounds like cable news network" and use the long form of this CNN.
- alkonaut 7y agoSomewhere between HTML and CNN. The crowd here is familiar enough with HTML but CNN is not only a smaller abbreviation but also an ambiguous one here.
- littlestymaar 7y ago> Where would you draw the line though? Would you want the same for e.g. HTML? The day someone uses “HTML” to mean “hyper-threaded machine learning” or whatever, yes definitely. CNN was unambiguously used for the TV channel for decades now, of course some people are confused when one uses it to mean something else without warning.
- qubex 7y agoHTML has no alternative interpretation in widespread usage so it is appropriate for use in any context where average general knowledge can be assumed. HN is suitable here because it can be assumed that Hacker News denizens are acquainted with a rather obvious shorthand for their own community. YC... likely as above but might be safer explicated and explained.