> when considering that the CCP has a well established track record of outright lying and denying facts Fine, then expose the lies. Also, typing "CCP" makes it

> when considering that the CCP has a well established track record of outright lying and denying facts Fine, then expose the lies. Also, typing "CCP" makes it very obvious you have an agenda. And as I said, everybody lies. > What interest would the Australian government have in challenging China, when much of their economy relies on them! It's called the american/anglo-american/western world order. The same reason Canada arrested a chinese executive. Before ww2, germany relied on soviet union for their economy and Japan relied on the US for their economy. WW2 still happened. Not sure why you think economic reliance necessarily prevents national rivalries. Especially during a major trade war. > On top of that, most of the provided information just matches other independent research. I'm sure they do. Propaganda usually works that way. And I wouldn't be so loose with words like "indepedent research". > The only one who is defending propagandists is you. Aren't you the one defending Australian Strategic Policy Institute? The only one defending propagandists is you. I'm more than happy to call all propagandists out.