My original post contained the suspicion that nobody was estimating cost. Although I never clicked the link, someone else ("def8cefe") posted as a response to m

My original post contained the suspicion that nobody was estimating cost. Although I never clicked the link, someone else ("def8cefe") posted as a response to me, that they indeed did not use cost but current value. So, despite being downvoted, I think I made a substantive contribution in identifying the headline as misleading. This in turn would affect how a reasonable person interprets the meaning of the whole thing. What is your point?