3 ms·
On their podcast a bit back, they had a somewhat surprising retrospective on their role as a news agency during issues such as the Clinton email incident, Trump
by NikolaeVarius 7y ago
On their podcast a bit back, they had a somewhat surprising retrospective on their role as a news agency during issues such as the Clinton email incident, Trumps rise to power, and other events where they make the statement they might have to be more careful in the future about what they say and how they say it.
Though I'm still somewhat skeptical this is done from an entirely neutral/altruistic perspective
- throwaway36472 7y agoSkeptical that what is done from an entirely neutral/altruistic perspective?
- NikolaeVarius 7y agoInternal policy changes regarding how they report the news. I somehow doubt they would care enough to report how they are changing internally if anyone but Trump had won the election.
- mc32 7y agoIf they had sincere regrets they'd have had their bulb light up after the build-up to Iraq.
- theklr 7y agoI mean you saw they made their democratic endorsement a joke because they now wanted to play the TV game. Plus for a global paper; the editorial staff is the typical costal elite. It’s going to be a delicate balance to keep it up.