> I am inclined to believe this is accurate You shouldn't. Almost everything ughyur and xinjiang related has pretty much been shown to be propaganda and from h

> I am inclined to believe this is accurate You shouldn't. Almost everything ughyur and xinjiang related has pretty much been shown to be propaganda and from highly questionable sources. You should be inclined towards skepticism. > however I don’t know anything about the organization producing the report. It's literally australian government/defense propaganda. "The Australian Strategic Policy Institute (ASPI) is a non-partisan defence and strategic policy think tank based in Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, founded by the Australian government and partly funded by the Australian Department of Defence." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_Strategic_Policy_Institute https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_Strategic_Policy_In... Not saying the treatment of ughyurs are good or bad, but the first casualty in every war is the truth. The more interesting question is how does government propaganda make it to the frontpage without much pushback?