4 ms·
Are there many examples in the real world of this actually happening?
by qeqeqeqe 7y ago
Are there many examples in the real world of this actually happening?
- WrtCdEvrydy 7y agoClose to home... yes, the FIU bridge engineers could have been charged with manslaughter (https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/crime/article236597488.html https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/crime/article23659748...)
- qeqeqeqe 7y agoI'm pretty sure anyone that works on something that kills people "could" be charged manslaughter. The entire PE system seems antiquated and obsolute.
- fnordfnordfnord 7y agoYes but that has nothing to do with the State Board of Engineering Examiners or whatever Florida's equivalent is.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- slavik81 7y agoThe discipline notices for these sorts of organizations are always public. You can browse through the cases on their website [1]. Most of the enforcement actions against licensed professional engineers in Oregon seem to be for failing to complete their required professional development hours (e.g. [2]), though I did find an interesting case of a P.Eng. who was sanctioned for revealing client data [3]. [1]: https://www.oregon.gov/osbeels/rulesstatutes/Pages/Disciplinary-Actions.aspx https://www.oregon.gov/osbeels/rulesstatutes/Pages/Disciplin... [2] https://www.oregon.gov/osbeels/Documents/FinalOrders/20191112_3073_Kim.pdf https://www.oregon.gov/osbeels/Documents/FinalOrders/2019111... [3] https://www.oregon.gov/osbeels/Documents/FinalOrders/20190711_3131_Galli.pdf https://www.oregon.gov/osbeels/Documents/FinalOrders/2019071...
- qeqeqeqe 7y agoYeah, looking at the lists of violations makes it pretty clear that the system is obsolete. These are the same people that claimed they could fine every single engineer working at Intel for not technically being certified.
- omegaham 7y agoI'm sure that if they actually started going after people, everyone's job title would magically shift to "Technology Developer" or something similar.
- NamTaf 7y agoCountless. Here's [1] an example of the Board pursuing a company and their Professional Enigneers for an org structure that facilitated signing off of engineering work without satisfying the 'direct supervision' clause of the act. Specifically, the guy signing it off was based about 1500 km away from the team doing the work, and the head of the team doing the work, who was in reality supervising it, was not qualified to do so as a Professional Engineer. As a second example, the coroner's investigation into the Dreamworld fatalities from a few years ago came out just last week [2,3]. In it the coroner recommended that the Board of Professional Engineers investigate the engineering firm that signed off the certification for the ride, over potential gross failures of practicing with due diligence. This may result in the approving Professional Engineer having their license to practice revoked. [1]: https://www.queenslandjudgments.com.au/case/id/76335 https://www.queenslandjudgments.com.au/case/id/76335 [2]: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-02-24/dreamworld-accident-inquest-coroner-findings/11993742 https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-02-24/dreamworld-accident-i... [3]: https://www.smh.com.au/national/queensland/dreamworld-inquest-coroner-hands-down-findings-on-thunder-river-rapids-ride-deaths-20200224-p543nl.html https://www.smh.com.au/national/queensland/dreamworld-inques...