3 ms·
https://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i7-9700K-vs-AMD-Ryzen-7-3800X/4030vs4047 https://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i7-9700K-vs... Compa
by balls187 7y ago
https://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i7-9700K-vs-AMD-Ryzen-7-3800X/4030vs4047 https://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i7-9700K-vs...
Comparing the similar priced Intel and AMD CPU's shows Intel has a slight advantage.
Reading the conclusion, it seems for Overclocked performance, AMD is the winner, especially when factoring in large core workloads.
As games and typical "home-user" scenarios are not designed to take advantage of large multi-core CPU's, Intel would appear to be the better choice at the ~$350 CPU level.
- unlinked_dll 7y agoI mean gamers probably shouldn't be buying a processor for $350 unless they plan on doing parallel workloads anyway. The tier below it won't be a bottleneck.
- tuananh 7y agodont use this site. they do all kind of shady things to make Intel CPUs look better https://www.reddit.com/r/buildapc/comments/chco8h/userbenchmark_should_no_longer_be_used_after_they/ https://www.reddit.com/r/buildapc/comments/chco8h/userbenchm...
- balls187 7y agoThank you. I was not aware of that.