3 ms·

Can we get a (2005)?

• rolph 7y ago
  there is a difference between tech and science with regard to correlations between recency and quality. Scientific articles gain credibility as they age and no known exception to elucidated principles is apparent. in this case the [2005] article is superior to a [2020] article. i do agree however it is helpful and conventional to include a date of publication
  • _bxg1 7y ago
    People reading quickly might mistake it for being about the current Coronavirus. The date would help rule that out.
    • rolph 7y ago
      for all intents and purposes it is about the current coronavirus. regardless of drift the viral peplomer is still being used to dock with the ACE2 receptor protien and still uses a small sequence region to bind the receptor.