From the transcript: >"Pursuing a G.I., particularly with a long term view, was the central mission of open A.I.. And yeah, there was the traditional Silicon V

From the transcript: >"Pursuing a G.I., particularly with a long term view, was the central mission of open A.I.. And yeah, there was the traditional Silicon Valley talk of changing the world, but also this sense that if HDI was done wrong, it could have very scary consequences." If the concern was truly avoiding AGI was done wrong which presumably includes its development being in the hands of a select few tech giants. Wouldn't it be better to simply wind the operation down rather take money one of those few tech giants leading in AI development then running a company with motives that are odds with each other? Just off the top of my head doesn't it seem that Microsoft with its new billion dollar investment now stand to benefit from that first billion dollars of investment made to the non-profit OpenAI more so than anybody else?