The most interesting point made is that secular societies still have a clerisy (or clergy? What's the difference?). People who are powerful but not rich; derivi

The most interesting point made is that secular societies still have a clerisy (or clergy? What's the difference?). People who are powerful but not rich; deriving their power from moral authority; and highly dogmatic. The details of the piece don't have quite enough support given how contraversial they are. That doesn't mean the author is wrong though. Worth more exploration and discussion.