There is no easy answer to this. I've seen many resumes that contain 1 or 2 small grammatical errors or typos. I don't get too hung up on those. However, if

There is no easy answer to this. I've seen many resumes that contain 1 or 2 small grammatical errors or typos. I don't get too hung up on those. However, if the resume is poorly constructed overall, I usually won't choose that candidate for further consideration. Every part of our jobs todays involves communications with others. I personally HATE chat-speak in email. "R u going 2 lunch 2day" drives me fucking bonkers, and I don't care if you're typing it on a phone where you have to tap 2 wires together to spell out the message in morse code. So, for me, I really don't want to interact with someone where every other communication is likely to make me want to strangle them. Similarly, even if they have poor English, I don't want people to require a decoder-ring to dissect their every message. So, depending on the exact details of the resume, I would have probably done the same thing. The exceptions tend to be when you require a particular skill set that seems to be most predominant in someone that is not a native English speaker. EG: if I were hiring an expert on Russian social networks, I would not expect to find an ideal candidate that didn't also make some grammatical errors at times.