Also though, as Craig points out, that this particular treaty is fully legal as is only in existence (and the political part of the treaty) because of the enabl

Also though, as Craig points out, that this particular treaty is fully legal as is only in existence (and the political part of the treaty) because of the enabling act of law, not void because of it. Any and all treaties have incredible legal scrutiny for years before being signed. Also of note is a similar legal treaty case that the UK government lost in this same week, regarding the paris agreement and them trying to build a new Heathrow runway, trying to break a treaty they had signed. If he was not in the US, then how could he have committed a criminal act, if US law applies only to the US territories. It is some mental gymnastics to pick and choose legality like a pick 'n mix sweet shop.