4 ms·
first, people have to care enough before they can change the world. in my experiences, many people just don't care about anything outside of their immediate sur
by wumi 18y ago
first, people have to care enough before they can change the world. in my experiences, many people just don't care about anything outside of their immediate surroundings, for better or worse.
second, the barrier to entry for a web 2.0 company relative to a company that will organize the world's health, hunger,thirst, etc. is a few orders of magnitude lower.
I've got a few friends with prototypes for companies that could effect serious change on the scale Umair constantly references, but they'd need several millions of dollars before having something that's even ready for mass production.
(edit: these buddies of mine, will end up working for corporate america in non-innovative companies because they just don't have the resources to be able to take their prototypes and build them into companies. One of the guys would need about 18 months and 6 full-time research technicians/machinists.)
even with PG's "be good" it's debatable how much the majority of YC companies are going to have a positive impact on the world ... but then again, is that their aim?
maybe Fred, Umair, and a few other big players idea/operations/capital wise should start a YC to attack those very problems with young, hungry, entrepreneurs. $250-$500k per entrepreneur should be fairly reasonable to get to marketable prototype/ alpha version.
- fredwilson 18y agothat's a good idea. i have certain responsibilities to our investors that i have to live up to. but a YC to change the world is a great idea
- ryanspahn 18y agoYes that would be a good idea! As for organizing the world's health, we may look to the future toilet connected to the Internet as a solution? Upon use this smart toilet sends your specimen data over the net to doctor's computer. If there are any irregularities in the data you receive an email to schedule an appointment. With the world using such a technology and all the data compiled, I'm thinking our life expectancy rate would increase! Im not in the medical field so Im not sure if using specimen data would be a fool proof way for early detection of life threatening diseases or not? *Not sure why this got dugg down? Is there someone in the medical field who knows this concept would not work or argue against it?
- wumi 18y agoI've heard of a company with a similar concept, although not utilizing toilets. Mashavu enables medical professionals to e-adopt children in the developing world using modern technology and communications infrastructure.