4 ms·

I'm sure this is the reason. Not being honest about it is a problem.

by wolco 7y ago

baq 7y ago
Why didn’t they buy working kits from other countries though? They had weeks to do that.
- trylfthsk 7y ago
  My guess is that lead time for the volumes they'd need is about a month if buying from overseas - and that's assuming a foreign supplier could absorb the extra kit volume.
- tejtm 7y ago
  Without being derogatory (only ironic); Made in China. That said it is a pandemic, those other countries are going to need their kits as much as anyone will.
- Zach_the_Lizard 7y ago
  And even worse, I believe they banned buying foreign test kits, so local authorities, hospitals, etc. had no ability to take matters into their own hands.
- adrianmonk 7y ago
  I wouldn't be at all surprised if it's just bad project management. You know how, when you really need to something accomplished without delay, you pursue two paths in parallel, so that by the time phase 1 comes to a close, you've got things ready for phase 2? Well, maybe the CDC doesn't. Obviously they do on some level because they did develop kits (which had problems, which delayed them). But it's one thing to give lip service to getting started on stuff you're going to need in the near future, and it's another thing to commit to it and follow through with it and make sure it happens. Also, I'm sure they were super busy and had other priorities, but lack of testing means the country is flying blind, so this should have made the short list of priorities.
- makomk 7y ago
  Probably because there's absolutely no reason to do so? It's not like the US has a shortage of labs that can produce these kits. Supposedly, the problem was that the CDC lab tasked with mass producing the testing kits wasn't competent to do so and didn't realise it - if the government had known what the problem was, they could've contracted production out to another US lab sooner. With the benefit of hindsight we of course know that getting kits from somewhere else would've been better, but imagine how much harder this problem would be to diagnose if the kits were sourced from some foreign lab the FDA didn't have access to.

I'm sure this is the reason. Not being honest about it is a problem.

by wolco 7y ago

I'm sure this is the reason. Not being honest about it is a problem.

baq 7y ago

Why didn’t they buy working kits from other countries though? They had weeks to do that.

trylfthsk 7y ago
My guess is that lead time for the volumes they'd need is about a month if buying from overseas - and that's assuming a foreign supplier could absorb the extra kit volume.
tejtm 7y ago
Without being derogatory (only ironic); Made in China. That said it is a pandemic, those other countries are going to need their kits as much as anyone will.
Zach_the_Lizard 7y ago
And even worse, I believe they banned buying foreign test kits, so local authorities, hospitals, etc. had no ability to take matters into their own hands.
adrianmonk 7y ago
I wouldn't be at all surprised if it's just bad project management. You know how, when you really need to something accomplished without delay, you pursue two paths in parallel, so that by the time phase 1 comes to a close, you've got things ready for phase 2? Well, maybe the CDC doesn't. Obviously they do on some level because they did develop kits (which had problems, which delayed them). But it's one thing to give lip service to getting started on stuff you're going to need in the near future, and it's another thing to commit to it and follow through with it and make sure it happens. Also, I'm sure they were super busy and had other priorities, but lack of testing means the country is flying blind, so this should have made the short list of priorities.
makomk 7y ago
Probably because there's absolutely no reason to do so? It's not like the US has a shortage of labs that can produce these kits. Supposedly, the problem was that the CDC lab tasked with mass producing the testing kits wasn't competent to do so and didn't realise it - if the government had known what the problem was, they could've contracted production out to another US lab sooner. With the benefit of hindsight we of course know that getting kits from somewhere else would've been better, but imagine how much harder this problem would be to diagnose if the kits were sourced from some foreign lab the FDA didn't have access to.