3 ms·
> If Nato had stepped in after Syria used chemical weapons we may not have had a global refugee crisis. Let me give my point of view: if NATO countries had avo
by Udik 7y ago
> If Nato had stepped in after Syria used chemical weapons we may not have had a global refugee crisis.
Let me give my point of view: if NATO countries had avoided supporting, training, financing and arming the "rebels", the war would have been over in six months- it probably wouldn't even have started. The refugees, the destroyed cities and the hundreds of thousands of deaths are fully on the conscience of the West.
- mcguire 7y agoA stable military dictatorship is the preferred form of government.
- boomboomsubban 7y agoNATO has no issues with military dictatorships as long as they support NATO, it is the form of government arming and training rebels would likely create.
- pjc50 7y agoAt least one of the rebel factions was islamist - ISIS and Al Quaeda. They were armed by the abandoned weapon dumps of Iraq. If the war had been over in 6 months it could only have been so by genocide.