4 ms·
If you paint with that broad brush, the users whose data PRISM consumes are also part of the PRISM program. That's a fairly useless definition. What people are
by lern_too_spel 7y ago
If you paint with that broad brush, the users whose data PRISM consumes are also part of the PRISM program. That's a fairly useless definition. What people are interested when talking about PRISM is whom the NSA integrates with.
- monocasa 7y agoEnd users didn't build automated systems to comply with government requests and integrate with the PRISM program. End users also aren't listed in NSA documentation as collaborators.
- lern_too_spel 7y agoGoogle also isn't listed in NSA documentation as collaborators. Google also didn't integrate with the PRISM program. Same. Edit (responding too fast): > Literally page five lists the companies Page 5 doesn't say they are "collaborators." > and page six lists the per company agreement dates Page 6 doesn't say there was an "agreement" with those companies. It simply lists the dates that the FBI made data they have from these companies available for ingestion. Stop pretending words exist in the documents that don't. That's conspiracy theory nonsense by the exact same method as Pizzagate.
- monocasa 7y agoLiterally page five lists the companies, and page six lists the per company agreement dates. Stop gaslighting us.
- tpmx 7y agoThe title of page six is: "Dates When PRISM Collection Began for Each Provider". That is not the same as "company agreement", by any stretch of the imagination. (gaslighting? seriously? you're clearly the person who is trying really, really, hard to twist the facts here) I don't like Google more than anyone else. The truth though, that's important stuff worth spending time defending.