Because the guardian uses diogwhistles when under threat of defamation. Instead of outright lying/name-calling Paul a right wing extremist - which opens up the

Because the guardian uses diogwhistles when under threat of defamation. Instead of outright lying/name-calling Paul a right wing extremist - which opens up the guardian to fact checks and defamation lawsuits, they just imply it, with what to a bystander seems like irrelevant phrasing, but the very-online left knows exactly what the guardian means. If you want a dogwhistle --> reality translation, you should follow the top comments on this, on Twitter