He does make a point that a good deal of the Web 2.0 resources are going into rather banal items: new chat, new social networking, making simple things a bit co

He does make a point that a good deal of the Web 2.0 resources are going into rather banal items: new chat, new social networking, making simple things a bit cooler and maybe a bit simpler. Can you blame him for wanting to be involved in more revolutionary developments, taking all of this great technology and really making a difference in the world?