4 ms·
Exactly. The article is part of the farce as I see it, in that they still continue to take Twitter seriously: >>...that a teenager using next to no resources w
by injb 7y ago
Exactly. The article is part of the farce as I see it, in that they still continue to take Twitter seriously:
>>...that a teenager using next to no resources was able to quickly create a fake candidate in his free time and get it verified by Twitter raises questions about the company's preparedness ...
Raises questions? On the contrary - it settles any questions about about their preparedness.
>>The creation of a fake candidate account is in violation of our rules and the account has been permanently suspended
So the punishment for not existing is, you get banned. That's actually their response.
Next up: teenager uploads photo of all legitimate candidates to ThisPersonIsNotReal.com and gets them all perma-banned from Twitter...
- SlowRobotAhead 7y ago> So the punishment for not existing is, you get banned. That's actually their response. Ha yea...If you expected introspection, you don’t know Twitter the company very well. I really hope SV moves past this “surely we have an obligation to direct society” thing and gets back to hackers and geeks doing cool things. Not holding my breathe though.