3 ms·
I'm not sure if that's entirely fair. She did shed light on the nature of the limit (the how): it's not a quantum speed limit, where suddenly more energy input
by siglesias 16y ago
I'm not sure if that's entirely fair. She did shed light on the nature of the limit (the how): it's not a quantum speed limit, where suddenly more energy input to a body moving at c has no effect (as would probably be a classical interpretation), but rather that the very geometry of our universe constantly revises our notion of time as we move about space, such that the idea of a body moving "faster than c" is a violation of that geometry. I call that pretty insightful, for all that the idea of a universal speed limit could possibly imply.