3 ms·
>It was solved (for AI) by Stuart Russell in his new book Human Compatible Correction: it was downplayed by Stuart Russell. Stuart took simplistic strawman exa
by xamuel 7y ago
>It was solved (for AI) by Stuart Russell in his new book Human Compatible
Correction: it was downplayed by Stuart Russell. Stuart took simplistic strawman examples and made them look silly by assuming perfectly calibrated common sense in the hypothetical AGI. (Based on skimming the link you posted; I haven't read Stuart's book.)
- chongli 7y agoYou should read instead of skim. Stuart Russell specifically rejects the idea of “perfectly calibrated common sense” in AI. He says AI should not interpret any command literally, but instead take a Bayesian approach. This is much closer to how humans respond to one another’s demands.
- naniwaduni 7y agoCongratulations, you've reduced a hard problem to a harder problem!