It constantly lies about how complicated real-world systems are, and optimize for the 90% case, ignoring correctness I don't know how this comment appears to c

It constantly lies about how complicated real-world systems are, and optimize for the 90% case, ignoring correctness I don't know how this comment appears to come as a new thought after them using Go in production. I don't use it at all for work but that is literally my understanding of the point of Go; granular "correctness" as a trade off for the productivity it provides if you're doing things that are just on the "good path"