4 ms·
Honestly I think the IndieHackers website looks nice. I need to get Webase [1] added to IndieHackers! I get a strong "spartan" vibe from Profit Hunt ... or m
by harrisreynolds 7y ago
Honestly I think the IndieHackers website looks nice. I need to get Webase [1] added to IndieHackers!
I get a strong "spartan" vibe from Profit Hunt ... or maybe just sparse! :-)
[1] https://www.webase.com https://www.webase.com
- XCSme 7y agoIt looks ok, but for me the loading times are awful, sometimes it takes 10s+ to load a page.
- 100-xyz 7y agoAgreed. It's terribly slow and has crashed my browser a few times. The content is good but their tech is terrible.
- dewey 7y agoIf you look at the network tab and the web sockets you know why. It's crazy what they are doing in the background to get this simple interface to load.
- harrisreynolds 7y agoMaybe we need an indie hacker to help them understand caching over at IndieHackers. :-)
- cuu508 7y agoJS files served by IndieHackers do have caching headers. But there's 4MB of JS. Compare to HN, a single 2KB script for submitting votes without page reload, and that's it.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- nojvek 7y agoWebase is great. Love the name.