3 ms·
DoT would also mitigate it in a similar fashion. In both cases mitigate doesn't really have much meaning since, sans VPN, ISPs that are inclined to do so will q
by corford 7y ago
DoT would also mitigate it in a similar fashion. In both cases mitigate doesn't really have much meaning since, sans VPN, ISPs that are inclined to do so will quite happily continue to find ways to infer where you're browsing to (IP address and CT log correlation being the obvious choices). Ergo, if last mile privacy is you're issue, the best bet is a VPN or some improved regulation so that consumers have a choice if they want an ISP that doesn't spy on them.
- tptacek 7y agoDoT and DoH have virtually identical service models. The practical difference between the two is that DoT deliberately runs on a nonstandard port, so that network operators can filter it. It's not an exaggeration to say that DoT is simply DoH with a network kill switch.
- corford 7y agoWhen was the last time port 995 or 993 were blocked? If the same adoption happened with DoT, ISPs wouldn't have the option - customers wouldn't accept it.