I think with the sufficient motivation I could create a desire to force surveillance in. It isn't about technology. It's about people. Our views are like water.

I think with the sufficient motivation I could create a desire to force surveillance in. It isn't about technology. It's about people. Our views are like water. You create the right channels and you can create a rushing torrent in one direction. Do something else and you have a placid lake. For instance, I could mention the idea that people can hack their systems and then you get: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21988606 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21988606 > This doesn't address the fundamental issue: a car is being controlled by an untested and unregulated system on public roads. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21986685 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21986685 > Does this imply they're encouraging anyone to write buggy code and drive their cars with it?!? It's easy. You just make it about the guys who could be running 'untested', 'unregulated' code on their cars so you need a hardware security module that reports on the car constantly and then you track them by their 5G tower. Admittedly if we quickly get non-tracking-based solutions out there it immunizes us to these fears.