> Dot density maps _MUST_ be set to scale relative to your map scale, or else you get nightmare scenarios like this one[2] There are a lot of flaws with the vi

> Dot density maps _MUST_ be set to scale relative to your map scale, or else you get nightmare scenarios like this one[2] There are a lot of flaws with the visualizations of the infections. But using choropleth representations would need a population reference no ? I'm genuinely curious, should the range be reflective of the population with the series the infections ? It could then be enhanced with deaths per infections in certain regions, which could be further enchanced with distance to hospitals. I sound like an ass right now but the data is here, we should use it properly to help, and with people like yourself, maybe it would be better than whats being given right now