2 ms·
OSCP has too high of a fail rate to only demonstrate very basic skills, it's a bit more than that (if so, that puts CISSP, CEH, etc. way futher down yet you see
by vsareto 7y ago
OSCP has too high of a fail rate to only demonstrate very basic skills, it's a bit more than that (if so, that puts CISSP, CEH, etc. way futher down yet you see those as job requirements all the time). There are plenty of people without it and employed still doing pentesting. This was my reality, I don't know how actually going through that situation qualifies it as anything but reality.
This is another thing: people value those certs really differently and it's almost worth not doing them at all, again going back to: just learn to code. And to your point: more communicating badly.
There's not a single more valuable qualifier than experience and yet that's the hardest thing to get when it really shouldn't be. Med students assist with surgeries but they aren't put in charge, I don't see why pentesting can't be the same.
I think you've taken the rare, good, working parts of the industry and believe that to be a baseline, and I don't think it's realistic.
- jcims 7y agoThanks for the exchange. Your experience with trying to enter a field that I'm probably all too complacent about at this point has been very informative and I'll definitely incorporate it when I'm encountering those that are trying the same.