Basically, it comes down to: the claims in patents are interpreted very narrowly. If your device/method doesn't exactly match the claim elements of the indepen

Basically, it comes down to: the claims in patents are interpreted very narrowly. If your device/method doesn't exactly match the claim elements of the independent claim(s) in Apple's patent - even one little difference in implementation is enough - then your device/method is not infringing. Don't worry, be happy.