3 ms·
Why in the hell is this considered...technical?
by ruffyen 7y ago
Why in the hell is this considered...technical?
- wnevets 7y agoIf it is not, why would it matter? Hacker news always has non technical post on its front page.
- ruffyen 7y agoWhile that may be true this is a new level information i dont care about...
- jlisam13 7y agothen don't read it
- jvagner 7y ago...and if you can't stand to see it, "hide" it.
- mwfunk 7y agoIf you don't care about it, can you even imagine how much other people don't care about you not caring about it? Seriously. And if you think it's silly to point that out, you're the one posting in a thread about how you don't care about the thing that the thread is about.
- rstupek 7y agoApparently enough of us care about it to make it to the front page... go figure
- kevinlou 7y agoThat's perfectly fine if you don't care about it, but there are plenty of us that do.
- lacker 7y agoIt is physics. Have a look at their published physics paper, it's quite technical. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsif.2019.0622 https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsif.2019.062...
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- jjeaff 7y agoI would hazzard a guess that quite a lot of engineers are into cooking because it can be a highly technical and scientific process that involves chemistry, physics, and engineering with delicious results. And the highly technical paper in this post attests to that.
- anonsivalley652 7y agoWhat the Discovery channel, I mean ArsTechnica, calls "science" shall not be questioned! ;) Also it has "Royal Society" in the paper so it has carte blanche to pick seemingly frivolous topics if they have merit. Furthermore, very good cooking is mostly scientific with some art. French Guy Cooking's Alex has more of a lab/workshop than a kitchen because he's so fanatical to improve the art and science of food.
- robbrown451 7y agoI personally find it pretty amazing that, as they mention, no one has succeeded in making a robot that can do it effectively. That is certainly a technical issue. It seems to me something that is highly automatable. The fact that it is something that physicists are studying and it is published on Ars Technica seems to me to be enough to justify it being technical enough for Hacker News (which generally doesn't have to be technical per se, but just intellectually interesting to technically oriented people)