3 ms·
I did try it, but not enough, I guess, to tell the beautiful core you talk about from the rest. So Haskell seemed to me full of elegant ideas, yet less elegant
by euccastro 16y ago
I did try it, but not enough, I guess, to tell the beautiful core you talk about from the rest. So Haskell seemed to me full of elegant ideas, yet less elegant, as a whole, than Scheme.
- Locke1689 16y agoWhich Scheme are you talking about? I find the awful type system of base R6RS to be extremely inelegant. Contracts and strong typing make formal reasoning about programs far more powerful, hence more modern Scheme-style languages like Racket.
- euccastro 16y agoGood catch. I was talking about R5RS and earlier.