> but if you want to contribute code back, pretty much all popular open-source projects would want them to assign copyright back to them. This is not the case.

> but if you want to contribute code back, pretty much all popular open-source projects would want them to assign copyright back to them. This is not the case. > Licensing will govern what you can and cannot do with the repo you clone or fork. And this is _precisely_ where you and the open source ethos differ. > the argument on whether it violates open_source ethos or not has to be around that clause. The argument has been settled. Over and over again. Restrictions on use = not Open Source.