I wasn't aware that this claim was central to the suit, thanks for that. Many people here are not focusing on that claim. EDIT: Per other replies, it seems like

I wasn't aware that this claim was central to the suit, thanks for that. Many people here are not focusing on that claim. EDIT: Per other replies, it seems like that claim has a large amount of direct evidence against it. I think it is interesting that in some long-term sense there is pressure for the government's regulatory reach to move farther up the network layer stack. ~50+ years ago it was clear that telephone lines were a natural monopoly and required regulation. Over time this transferred to ISP's, over time this may transfer to "platform websites", which currently to me seems like a pretty dang vague category. It would be very strange for an Elizabeth-Warren-esque tech regulatory crackdown to occur without guaranteeing certain freedoms of speech for users.