4 ms·
>and it's definitely open source. Not according to what open source currently means, no.
by diffeomorphism 7y ago
>and it's definitely open source.
Not according to what open source currently means, no.
- ocdtrekkie 7y agoOnly if we define it as “what the OSI approves of”. Otherwise, SSPL doesn’t prohibit commercial use, it’s just a somewhat-aggressive copyleft license.